|
|
|
Why do some scholars say there is a conflict between judicial review and representative democracy?
Title: Why do some scholars say there is a conflict between judicial review and representative democracy?
Category: Law & Government / Government & Politics
Details: Words: 195 | Pages: 0.8 (approximately 235 words/page)
Why do some scholars say there is a conflict between judicial review and representative democracy?
Representative democracy is defined as a government in which officials are elected by the people. These officials are expected to govern as the majority of the people want. If this does not happen to the complete satisfaction of the voters, these officials can be voted out of office.
The concept of judicial review states that individuals appointed by high-ranking officials can determine the constitutionality of laws and actions passed by any individual on the country, …showed first 75 words of 195 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
|
|
…showed last 75 words of 195 total…system is by amending the Constitution. An amendment is a lengthy, tedious process that requires a large majority of the people to approve. The amending could also take several years, which would cause the suffering that caused the need for the amendment to continue for longer than necessary. Due to the length and nomination process of a judge's time in power, the idea of judicial review contrasts greatly with the principles of a representative democracy.
Need a custom written paper?
|
|
275 words per page